The Catch.A permanent record of checked claims
RECORDSAVED COPY

Saved copy of

California letter notifying the Court of the First Circuit stay denial

State of California · 2026-09-10

Back to source details

The saved file is a PDF document of 0.2 MB. What follows is the text taken from it, which is the text the story quotes.

Jump to the cited passage
ROB BONTA                                                                        State of California
Attorney General                                                         DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                                                 455 GOLDEN GATE AVE, SUITE 11000
                                                                                     SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-7004

                                                                                             Public: (415) 510-4400
                                                                                         Telephone: (415) 510-3466
                                                                                        E-Mail: Ian.Fein@doj.ca.gov

                                                   Sept. 10, 2026

       By Electronic Filing
       Hon. Scott S. Harris
       Office of the Clerk of Court
       Supreme Court of the United States
       1 First Street, NE
       Washington, DC 20543

       RE:    United States Postal Service, et al. v. California, et al., No. 26A305

       Dear Mr. Harris:

               Today, the First Circuit issued an order denying defendants’ and intervenors’ requested
       stay of the preliminary injunction. With respect to the likelihood of success on the merits, the
       First Circuit reasoned that Congress did not authorize the challenged USPS rule through “the
       ‘wafer-thin reed’ of a general grant of authority to manage the postal system.” Order at 6
       (quoting Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. 477, 499 (2023)). As to the equities, the First Circuit
       observed that the injunction is narrow, id. at 8 n.4, and emphasized that defendants and
       intervenors “have not even seriously challenged” the district court’s “detailed findings about the
       chaos and widespread disenfranchisement that would occur between now and November 3
       should the Final Rule take immediate effect, including the fact that it would be impossible for
       some States to” comply with the rule in time for the upcoming election, id. at 6; see also Br. of
       Amici Curiae Current and Former Election Officials in Support of Neither Party at 1-2, No.
       26A305 (U.S.) (explaining that “the work necessary” by “state and local election officials” to
       implement the rule “cannot be responsibly accomplished in the time that remains” before the
       November 2026 election).

                                                      Sincerely,

                                                      /s/ Ian Fein

                                                      IAN FEIN
                                                      Deputy Solicitor General

                                             For      ROB BONTA
                                                      Attorney General


       cc: All Counsel of Record
Source reader

Source