The Catch.A permanent record of checked claims
RECORDU.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Record · the original document behind a story

Fourth Circuit opinion, September 10, 2026

Published by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on September 10, 2026.

which courts required a bond hearing, and the count of individual cases

The cited passage, with surrounding source text

… III. Analysis For nearly three decades, all three branches of the federal government interpreted Section 1226 to apply to noncitizens—like Petitioners Lopez Garcia and Rivera—present in the United States without inspection and admission, and Section 1225 to apply to noncitizens arriving at our borders. The Petitioners are among thousands of noncitizens in the United States swept up and detained without bond as a result of the Government’s newly adopted construction of Section 1225. “To no one’s surprise and as the [G]overnment has acknowledged, this change in policy has led to a ‘tsunami’ of habeas --- page 15 --- 15 petitions” filed across the country. Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494, 509 n.3 (5th Cir. 2026) (Douglas, J., dissenting). In response to this tsunami, hundreds of federal district courts have considered the question we consider today. The overwhelming majority—over five hundred—rejected the Government’s new construction and sided with the petitioners in over twenty thousand individual cases.4 The debate has now reached every numbered United States court of appeals and has led to a circuit split. The First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits concluded that Section 1226 applies to noncitizens inside our country, like the Petitioners, and that they must thus be provided a bond hearing. Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, --- F.4th ---, 2026 WL 2352042 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026); Barbosa da Cunha v. Freden, 175 F.4th 61 (2d Cir. 2026); Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, --- F.4th ---, 2026 WL 2546223 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2026); Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 175 F.4th 713 (6th Cir. 2026); Cirrus Rojas v. Olson, 183 F.4th 909 (7th Cir. 2026); Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160 (9th Cir. 2026); Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, 180 F.4th 1226 (10th Cir. 2026); Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, Fed. Det. Ctr. Miami, 175 F.4th 1258 (11th Cir. 2026). The Fifth and Eighth Circuits ruled, on the other hand, that Section 1225 applies to all noncitizens who have not been admitted to the United States …

Read this passage in context

Read the original · Open the copy we saved

Where we use it

About this saved copy

The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.

Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
ad07bdd572fbb4939acd39318ea37983cd2749391d5034ba08cbe674d59f32f9

Timeline entries this record anchors: The Second Circuit affirms a bond hearing or release.

Source reader

Source