Record · the original document behind a story
Supreme Court to consider the mandatory detention policy
Published by CBS News on October 1, 2026.
the October 1 report; the tens-of-thousands count is not in the court or agency records admitted here
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… {"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsMediaOrganization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/","name":"CBS News","foundingDate":"1927-09-18","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CBSNews\/","https:\/\/instagram.com\/cbsnews\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/CBSNews","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/CBSNews","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/CBS_News"],"logo":[{"@type":"ImageObject","height":300,"width":300,"url":["https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/assets\/show\/cbsn\/logo-square-300x300.png"]}],"url":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/","description":"CBS News is a trusted source for the latest in politics, U.S. and world news. The network is home to award-winning broadcasts CBS Mornings, CBS Evening News, 60 Minutes, CBS Sunday Morning, 48 Hours and Face the Nation.","contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","telephone":"+1-888-369-4762","contactType":"customer service"},"address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"524 w 57th St.","addressLocality":"New York City","addressRegion":"New York","postalCode":"10019","addressCountry":"US"},"publishingPrinciples":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/cbs-news-publishing-principles\/"} </script> <script type="application/ld+json"> {"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","articleBody":"Washington \u2014 The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will consider whether the Trump administration can detain tens of thousands of immigrants during their removal proceedings without access to bond hearings.At the center of the case, known as Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, is the administration\u0027s mandatory detention policy, which targets all immigrants in the United States illegally, including those who have lived in the country for years. The question of whether the policy is lawful has divided federal appeals courts, though hundreds of district judges have rejected it.\u00a0Two\u00a0U.S. appeals courts have allowed noncitizens to be subject to mandatory detention without bond, but\u00a0nine others have ruled the Trump administration must provide certain immigrants with bond hearings and eligibility for release for the duration of their deportation proceedings.In the past, immigrants who had lived in the U.S. illegally for many years were eligible for bond hearings, where they could try to convince an immigration judge that they were not flight risks and could remain freed during their deportation cases. But last year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement tightened its detention rules and said detainees at risk of deportation were not eligible to be released on bond if they were in the U.S. illegally. Immigration authorities can, however, release them on parole for humanitarian or public-interest reasons.The agency previously said only certain immigrants, such as those convicted of certain crimes or who had more recently crossed into the U.S. illegally, were not eligible for bond hearings.As a result of the Trump administration\u0027s mandatory detention policy, scores of people who entered the U.S. illegally years ago, including those without criminal records, have been held by immigration authorities indefinitely.Thousands of cases challenging those mandatory detentions have been brought in courts across the country, straining federal prosecutors who have had to shift their attention away from criminal and other civil cases. Lower court decisions have broad impacts on those challenges.The mandatory detention policy is part of President Trump\u0027s broader crackdown on immigration. In the president\u0027s second administration, immigration authorities have arrested thousands of immigrants without criminal records and who only face civil immigration violations.In July, ICE detained more than 46,000 people for removal because of alleged immigration offenses, surpassing the 43,000 detentions by immigration authorities in June.ICE has launched operations in major cities targeting people who are in the country illegally, sometimes leading to violent and deadly clashes between immigration authorities and protesters.\u00a0Arguments in the case be heard in the Supreme Court\u0027s new term, which begins Monday.\"The courts have repeatedly and resoundingly rejected the Trump administration\u0027s radical misinterpretation of the law,\" said Michael K.T. Tan, deputy director of the ACLU\u0027s Immigrants\u0027 Rights Project. \"Try as it might, the government cannot twist the law to detain immigrants for months or even years on end without a bond hearing. Not only is it cruel and inhumane; it is unlawful.\"The ACLU filed the lawsuit challenging the Trump administration\u0027s mandatory detention policy last year.The legal battle involves a Brazilian citizen, Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa da Cunha, who came to the U.S. illegally more than 20 years ago. Barbosa da Cunha has never been convicted of a crime, according to court papers. He applied for asylum in 2016 and was granted a valid work permit.But last year, during a traffic stop in Massachusetts, Barbosa da Cunha was taken into custody by ICE officers, and the Department of Homeland Security initiated removal proceedings against him.Barbosa da Cunha requested a bond hearing, but an immigration judge denied the request on the grounds that he was subject to mandatory detention without the possibility of bond under a provision of federal immigration law.The Brazilian man then filed a petition in federal court alleging that his detention without access to a bond hearing was illegal and a violation of the Constitution\u0027s Due Process Clause.A federal judge in New York, where Barbosa da Cunha was being held in a detention facility, ruled in his favor. The judge ordered the government to hold a bond hearing within 10 days, and Barbosa da Cunha was released on bond in late October 2025.The Trump administration appealed that decision, and in April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit rejected the mandatory detention policy.\u00a0In its ruling, the appeals court called the policy the \"broadest mass-detention-without-bond mandate in our nation\u0027s history for millions of noncitizens.\"The administration\u0027s interpretation of the law, the 2nd Circuit panel said, would \"send a seismic shock through our immigration detention system and society, straining our already overcrowded detention infrastructure, incarcerating millions, separating families, and disrupting communities.\"The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to review the 2nd Circuit\u0027s decision, though a ruling from the nation\u0027s highest court will impact thousands of cases brought by immigrants challenging their detentions without the opportunity for a bond hearing.","dateModified":"2026-10-01T11:46:13-0400","articleSection":["Politics"],"author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Melissa Quinn","url":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/team\/melissa-quinn\/","description":"Melissa Quinn is a senior reporter for CBSNews.com, where she covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.\r\n\r\nMelissa graduated from the University of Florida in 2012 with a degree in journalism and is now based in Washington, D.C. She began her journalism career working as a general assignment reporter for the Alexandria Times in Alexandria, Virginia, where she covered an array of issues impacting the local community, including local politics, crime and education. \r\n\r\nBefore joining CBS News in 2019, Melissa covered the Supreme Court, the White House and business for the Washington Examiner. She has appeared on CNN, Fox News and MSNBC."}],"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/supreme-court-trump-mandatory-detention-policy-rhoney-v-barbosa-da-cunha\/","inLanguage ":"en","name":"Supreme Court to hear dispute over Trump\u0027s mandatory detention policy","headline":"Supreme Court to hear dispute over Trump\u0027s mandatory detention policy","description":"The Supreme Court said it will consider whether the Trump administration can detain tens of thousands of immigrants without access to bond hearings.","isAccessibleForFree":true},"headline":"Supreme Court to hear dispute over Trump\u0027s mandatory detention policy","description":"The Supreme Court said it will consider whether the Trump administration can detain tens of thousands of immigrants without access to bond hearings.","url":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/supreme-court-trump-mandatory-detention-policy-rhoney-v-barbosa-da-cunha\/","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":630,"width":1200,"url":"https:\/\/assets3.cbsnewsstatic.com\/hub\/i\/r\/2026\/10\/01\/fb0f58f7-1792-4f74-9d23-f4a6754541fd\/thumbnail\/1200x630\/4a6b9e3e1c67c4c1328beb868b64eafd\/gettyimages-2295955099.jpg"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/assets3.cbsnewsstatic.com\/hub\/i\/r\/2026\/10\/01\/fb0f58f7-1792-4f74-9d23-f4a6754541fd\/thumbnail\/1200x630\/4a6b9e3e1c67c4c1328beb868b64eafd\/gettyimages-2295955099.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-01T09:51:00-0400","publisher":{"@type":"NewsMediaOrganization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/","name":"CBS News"}} …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether people already in the country who were never admitted must be held without a bond hearing · cited for the count that is not in the court records
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
0e3680ab5a32dd6a64120d3be953d8fb11924e6e0ebd0fe77173c2915facac1a