The Catch.A permanent record of checked claims
RECORDU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Record · the original document behind a story

Defendants’ response on the recognition proposals

Published by U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on August 24, 2026.

The defendants’ conditional taken-down argument and the proposed amphitheater example.

The cited passage, with surrounding source text

… take three specific actions in order to recognize and acknowledge President Trump. In fact, though Congresswoman Beatty voted against the August 13 measure, she explicitly stated that she had “no objection” to one component of it—re-naming the Center’s grounds after President Trump to honor the work he is doing to save the Kennedy Center. Without those efforts, the Center will deteriorate further into an unsafe, decrepit structure that will be required to be taken down, with a determination to follow on what to build on the site, such as a large outdoor amphitheater overlooking the Potomac River that has been proposed, by some, for many years. Such a replacement will fail to adequately honor President John F. Kennedy, but would be simpler and more economical to build, operate, and maintain. Nevertheless, Beatty, seemingly motivated by a partisan end to ensure the Kennedy Center …

Read this passage in context

Read the original · Open the copy we saved

Where we use it

About this saved copy

The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.

Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
6638db2a6fa49a3e652aea6732896b72b046175dd1201ffc9dd6408424d7cce4
Source reader

Source