Record · the original document behind a story
Supreme Court takes up the mandatory detention policy
Published by The Hill on October 1, 2026.
the October 1 report that the Court will decide the legality of the policy
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… window.NXSTdata.alerts = window.NXSTdata.alerts || {}; window.NXSTdata.location = window.NXSTdata.location || {}; window.NXSTdata.content = Object.assign( window.NXSTdata.content, {"title":"Supreme Court takes up Trump's mandatory detention policy","homepageTitle":"","metaKeywords":"","socialTitle":"","pageType":"article","authorName":"Zach Schonfeld, Rebecca Beitsch","authorNonByline":"","description":"The Supreme Court announced Thursday it will decide the legality of President Trump’s mandatory detention policy, putting one of his banner immigration programs on the justices’ docket for their upcoming term. The Trump administration argues it can detain people without bond if they’re found to be in the country unlawfully, even if they have been living on…","publicationDate":"2026-10-01T09:39:09-04:00","lastModifiedDate":"2026-10-01T10:25:14-04:00","publicationDayOfWeek":"Thursday","categoryList":["Court Battles","News"],"primaryCategory":"Court Battles","tagList":[],"wordCount":527,"paragraphCount":18,"imageCount":0,"videoCount":1,"slideshowCount":0,"pageId":6122542,"providerName":"TheHill","isShared":false,"originalSource":"","sharingMode":"","pageDcode":["312","311","310","316","315","270","271","275","289","288","287","286","309","301","306","249","912","904","294","295","292","293","290"],"localId":"thehill-2-article-6122542","seoTitle":"Supreme Court will weigh Trump's mandatory detention policy","iabGenre":["other_politics"],"iabCategory":["IAB11-4"],"initialCreator":"kwadington","newsletterTitle":"","pageName":"thehill:supreme-court-mandatory-detention-policy-trump","publicationDateLocal":"2026-10-01","primaryCategoryId":1998,"persistentId":"thehill-2-article-6122542","nlpSentiment":{"score":-0.4,"magnitude":8.6},"nlpCategories":{"\/News\/Politics\/Other":0.97},"nlpOrganization":{"administration":0.15,"Supreme Court":0.1,"justices":0.08},"nlpPerson":{"people":0.08,"judges":0.02,"D. John Sauer":0.01},"nlpOther":{"Trump":0.07,"detention policy":0.03,"legality":0.03,"one":0.03,"immigration programs&nbsp":0.03,"docket":0.03,"bond&nbsp":0.01},"nlpEvent":{"term":0.03},"nlpLocation":{"country":0.02},"subCategory1":"","subCategory2":"","subCategory1Id":"","subCategory2Id":""} ) …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether people already in the country who were never admitted must be held without a bond hearing · cited for the grant as reported
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
fc4016ac39a70237718e9409a46201b3f8a2b14c7408f4871a98ec13247cfce8