Record · the original document behind a story
Hoover Institution, The Budget and Tax Effects of a Federal Public Option After COVID-19 (October 20, 2020)
Published by Hoover Institution on October 20, 2020.
The paper the ad's tax line rests on: how a public option could be financed by 2050 and what each route would cost families, published with support from the Partnership for America's Health Care Future.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… examine a variety of tax hike scenarios that could finance a public option and return federal debt projections to their pre-COVID-19 levels. Limiting the tax increases to high-earning households would produce marginal federal income tax rates of 60 percent in 2050, higher than any point in the last 40 years. Using broad-based taxes would require increasing all personal income tax rates by over 30 percent in 2050, raising taxes on middle-income families by over $2,000 a year. Alternatively, financing the public option with payroll taxes would require increasing the Hospital Insurance payroll tax by 180 percent in 2050, with taxes for typical families rising by over $3,900. In short, policymakers will likely need to choose between a number of significant tax hikes to help finance the high costs of a politically realistic public option. 1 Lanhee J. Chen, Ph.D. is the David and Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies at the Hoover Institution; Tom Church is a Policy Fellow at the Hoover …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- MAGA Inc. files $10 million in Texas Senate ads, split against Talarico and for Paxton · cited for the tax claim check: the paper's 2050 financing scenarios and its sponsor line
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
4438b480da603677fe263108c6536feb4b62ba91c977cc412be6c252076f2bf2