Record · the original document behind a story
Von Glahn opposition to the stay application
Published by Counsel for Richard von Glahn on September 7, 2026.
The challenger’s opposition, arguing the U.S. Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over a state-law holding.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… as possible to manufacture the present dispute over Missouri’s congressional districting map. See App. 739a (Missouri’s Attorney General publicly proclaiming that “delay works in our favor”). After the General Assembly passed HB 1, a mid- decade redistricting bill, voters timely submitted a valid referendum petition, which—by operation of Missouri law—prevented HB 1 from taking effect. As the Missouri Supreme Court explained, “HB 1 is not the law and has never been the law.” App. 12a n.8. “[T]he congressional districts the General Assembly established in 2022 remain in full force and effect for the November 2026 election.” App. 13a. Yet Missouri’s Secretary of State waited until the last possible day—and only after he had implemented HB 1 in the congressional primary—to object to the referendum, in the hopes of running out the clock on the judiciary’s tolerance for a …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- Missouri's highest court says the new U.S. House map never became law and sends it to a November vote · cited for the challenger’s jurisdiction argument and quotation of the Missouri holding
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
95c393f6bdd7c4084f95d336a64c1b6e9bb2d3a98d798de3bc64e4a469f94981
Timeline entries this record anchors: Stay application to the U.S. Supreme Court.