Record · the original document behind a story
Letter from Barbosa da Cunha's counsel, September 25, 2026
Published by Supreme Court of the United States on September 25, 2026.
counsel's letter that a new government petition presents the same constitutional issues as Genalo v. G.M., and the request to grant only the statutory question
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… Re: Putra v. Lopez-Campos, No. 25-1415 Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104 Buenrostro-Mendez v. Blanche, No. 26-43 Dear Mr. Harris, I write to follow up on my letter of September 11, 2026, concerning the dismissal of Genalo v. G.M., No. 25-886, which presented a similar constitutional issue to that briefed in Putra. The Government has now filed a petition for certiorari that presents the same constitutional issues as those presented in G.M. See Petition for Certiorari before Judgment 27–30, Genalo v. D.C., No. 26-379 (Sup. Ct. Sept. 21, 2026); see also Letter from D. John Sauer, Solicitor Gen., to Scott S. Harris, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court 2 (Sept. 11, 2026), https://perma.cc/DFX7-6287. For the reasons stated by Respondents in Putra and Rhoney and Petitioners in Buenrostro-Mendez, if this Court grants certiorari in D.C., it should grant only on the …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether people already in the country who were never admitted must be held without a bond hearing · cited for the new petition's constitutional issues, and the same request
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
0cce267141c3a9da0a2b2609d22b8b7d188319715a2516f7009010c252927ca0