Record · the original document behind a story
Memorandum and order granting a preliminary injunction
Published by U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on September 4, 2026.
Judge Talwani September 4 injunction. Reused pin.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… motions to dismiss in both cases, see Intervenors’ Mot. to Dismiss [Doc. No. 124]; Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss [Doc. No. 126], and dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), on prudential ripeness grounds, Plaintiff Organizations’ and Plaintiff States’ claims with regard to elections occurring after November 3, 2026. Mem. & Order 17 [Doc. No. 166]. The court denied dismissal in both cases on prudential ripeness grounds with regard to elections occurring before or on November 3, 2026. Id. b. Proceedings in California I On June 25, 2026, in California I, the court denied the remainder of Defendants’ and Intervenor-Defendants’ motions to dismiss the States’ complaint and granted summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff States. See California I, __ F. Supp. 3d __, No. 1:26-cv-11581, 2026 WL 1826490 (D. Mass. June 25, 2026). The court entered final judgment on July 7, 2026, enjoining …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- The administration asks the Supreme Court to lift a new block on mail-ballot rules · cited for the September 4 injunction, named DMM sections, November 3 limit
- The Supreme Court leaves the mail-ballot rule blocked · cited for the September 4 injunction the Court left in place
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
92542590981f5796ec159dcf310b8966719b6e0e76ef387fa877a04d5d1e9305
Timeline entries this record anchors: Talwani preliminary injunction.