Record · the original document behind a story
Untested in court, Trump's new tariffs on Canada raise legal questions
Published by Associated Press on August 29, 2026.
AP legal story on Section 338: never used, never tested in court, and AP's characterization that the administration made no attempt to calculate the dollar amount of damage.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… <script type="application/ld+json" id="link-ld-json">[{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","url":"https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariff-canada-supreme-court-depression-e5501950e025dbe8df2b7ec662dbe2e4","dateModified":"2026-08-29T12:39:17Z","datePublished":"2026-08-29T12:00:07Z","description":"In firing up a trade war with Canada, President Donald Trump turned to a 96-year-old statute so obscure that many trade lawyers didn’t even know it was still on the books. A week ago, Trump invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to slap a 50% tax on $20 billion worth of Canadian imports. The move prompted dollar-for-dollar retaliation from Ottawa and strained already-tense relations between the neighbors and longtime allies. The president’s Section 338 tariff authority has never been used, let alone tested in court. So it’s unclear whether Trump’s latest Canada tariffs could survive a legal challenge, and some lawyers argue that the Depression-era law has been rendered obsolete by more recent trade laws.","image":[{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"ImageObject","height":685,"thumbnailUrl":"https://dims.apnews.com/dims4/default/58e77f7/2147483647/strip/false/crop/3000x2098+0+0/resize/980x685!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.apnews.com%2F31%2F59%2Fbea0c0b644c67c99832c74aba225%2F1880b243c2154b8f989a0190e49a6e63","url":"https://dims.apnews.com/dims4/default/58e77f7/2147483647/strip/false/crop/3000x2098+0+0/resize/980x685!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.apnews.com%2F31%2F59%2Fbea0c0b644c67c99832c74aba225%2F1880b243c2154b8f989a0190e49a6e63","width":980}],"name":"Trump's new tariffs on Canada raises legal questions | AP News","mainEntityOfPage":{"primaryImageOfPage":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://dims.apnews.com/dims4/default/58e77f7/2147483647/strip/false/crop/3000x2098+0+0/resize/980x685!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.apnews.com%2F31%2F59%2Fbea0c0b644c67c99832c74aba225%2F1880b243c2154b8f989a0190e49a6e63","width":980,"height":685},"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariff-canada-supreme-court-depression-e5501950e025dbe8df2b7ec662dbe2e4"},"author":[{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"Person","name":"Paul Wiseman","url":"https://apnews.com/author/paul-wiseman"}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AP News","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://assets.apnews.com/19/66/bc546486408c8595f01753a9fbeb/ap-logo-176-by-208.svg"}},"articleSection":["Business"],"keywords":["Donald Trump","Canada","International trade","Economic policy","Government policy","Courts","General news","Tariffs and global trade","Trump tariff Canada Supreme court Depression","Politics","Business","Ryan Majerus","Canada government","Discrimination","John Veroneau","United States government","U.S. news","Recessions and depressions","U.S. News"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://dims.apnews.com/dims4/default/58e77f7/2147483647/strip/false/crop/3000x2098+0+0/resize/980x685!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.apnews.com%2F31%2F59%2Fbea0c0b644c67c99832c74aba225%2F1880b243c2154b8f989a0190e49a6e63","headline":"Trump's new tariffs on Canada raises legal questions"}]</script> …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- Canada's counter-tariffs on C$27.6 billion (about US$20 billion) of U.S. goods took effect September 8 · cited for AP's report that Section 338 has never been used, let alone tested in court
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
2a545c2024b9636aab8d7b167bed3f1d682138af8ceafc240c0dc6abb25e3c5c
Timeline entries this record anchors: Supreme Court holds IEEPA does not authorize the challenged tariffs.