Record · the original document behind a story
The War Powers Resolution: Concepts and Practice
Published by the Congressional Research Service on March 8, 2019.
CRS report R42699, updated March 8, 2019, on the War Powers Resolution, including the concurrent-resolution withdrawal provision, the 1983 Chadha decision, and the later joint-resolution route.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… with the express procedures of the Constitution’s prescription for legislative action: passage by a majority of both Houses and presentment to the President.” On July 6, 1983, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s decision striking down a provision in another law13 that permitted Congress to disapprove by concurrent (two-House) resolution.14 Since Section 5(c) requires forces to be removed by the President if Congress so directs by a concurrent resolution, it is constitutionally suspect under the reasoning applied by the Court.15 A 11 U.S. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. War Powers: A Test of Compliance relative to the Danang Sealift, the Evacuation of Phnom Penh, the Evacuation of Saigon, and the Mayaguez Incident. Hearings, May 7 and June 4, 1975. Washington: GPO, 1975. p. 69. 12 462 U.S. 919 (1983). 13 Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980. 14 Process Gas Consumers Group v. Consumer Energy Council, 463 U.S. 1216 (1983). …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- CBO estimates the Iran war has added $38.1 billion to Defense Department costs through August 1 · cited for what a concurrent resolution is, the Chadha decision, and the joint-resolution route
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
5786336f64b75645433ed7e640624b792f5645d1e177a37bac574abed43c5488