The Catch.A permanent record of checked claims
RECORDSecure World Foundation

Record · the original document behind a story

US Co-Orbital Anti-satellite Testing Fact Sheet

Published by Secure World Foundation on June 12, 2026.

Secure World Foundation's page for its 2026 U.S. co-orbital anti-satellite fact sheet: the open-source baseline before September. The PDF itself is hosted on dropbox.com, whose robots.txt refuses the registry, so the foundation's own page is the record.

The cited passage, with surrounding source text

… </svg></div></a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66dcc6872f6ed23bce1db235/684064eb827018860dad864d_Co-Orbital.jpg" loading="lazy" alt="" class="publication-header-img-right"/></header><div class="section-publication-content"><div class="padding-global"><div class="container-medium"><div class="padding-section-medium section-is-always-medium"><div class="publication-header-content-wrapper-left publication-body-width-override"><div class="text-rich-text w-richtext"><p>This fact sheet examines U.S. co-orbital anti-satellite testing and explains how the United States has developed many of the underlying technologies for co-orbital counterspace capabilities without maintaining an acknowledged dedicated program. It outlines the basic concept of co-orbital anti-satellite weapons and shows how close approach, rendezvous, targeting, and hit-to-kill technologies can support either non-offensive missions such as missile defense, satellite inspection, and servicing or, if adapted, offensive counterspace operations.</p><p>The document begins with the historical roots of U.S. co-orbital anti-satellite thinking, including Project SAINT, a Cold War Air Force effort that started as a satellite inspector concept but was also intended to evolve into a weapon system. It then focuses on the 1986 Delta 180 experiment, the only known U.S. co-orbital intercept test in space, which demonstrated tracking, guidance, and control for a space intercept and resulted in a successful collision in low Earth orbit. That test remains the clearest public example of a U.S. co-orbital intercept capability in practice.</p><p>The fact sheet also makes clear that current U.S. capabilities are better understood as dual-use building blocks than as an operational co-orbital anti-satellite force. It points to missions such as Prowler, XSS-11, and the Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program as examples of successful U.S. rendezvous and proximity operations in both low Earth orbit and geostationary orbit. These activities support space situational awareness, on-orbit inspection, and satellite servicing, but they also show that the United States retains the technical foundation to move toward a co-orbital capability if it chooses. The document notes that future systems tied to missile defense plans such as Golden Dome could deepen those concerns if space-based interceptors are deployed.</p><p>For readers following counterspace capabilities, missile defense, and military space technology, this fact sheet provides a concise overview of U.S. co-orbital anti-satellite testing and the broader technical base that surrounds it. It is especially useful for understanding how satellite inspection, rendezvous and proximity operations, missile defense architecture, and space security continue to overlap in U.S. space policy and military planning.</p></div><div class="publication-indicator-alert w-condition-invisible"><img src="https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/66cf82e93849a4f65e1e25d1/66ec9f376a2983bcdb41aa29_indicator-info-icon.svg" loading="lazy" alt="" class="indicator-info-img"/><div class="w-dyn-bind-empty"></div></div><div class="margin-top margin-editors-collection"><div class="margin-top margin-xsmall w-dyn-list"><div role="list" class="keywords-collection-list w-dyn-items"><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">ASAT (Anti-Satellite Weapons)</div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Counterspace</div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Space Security</div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Space Situational Awareness</div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Orbital Debris</div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Space Policy </div></div><div role="listitem" class="keyword-item w-dyn-item"><div class="text-size-small">Space Governance</div></div></div></div></div><div class="share-wrapper-mobile"><div class="publication-summary-card"><div class="text-size-small text-weight-medium text-color-white text-align-center">Share on Social Media</div><div class="card-social-share-wrapper"><a fs-socialshare-element="LinkedIn" href="#" class="button is-icon-only is-social-icon w-inline-block"><div class="icon-arrow-button w-embed"><svg width="20" height="20" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> …

Read this passage in context

Read the original · Open the copy we saved

Where we use it

About this saved copy

The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.

Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
8b06aeb6cb107b2c6bc946fcac87012fcf11b5cb9326c541c9d4358b14d66a73

Timeline entries this record anchors: Treaty, 2022 pledge, 2024 veto, doctrine, budget, open-source baseline.

Source reader

Source