Record · the original document behind a story
19 U.S.C. 1338, Discrimination by foreign countries
Published by United States Code, Office of the Law Revision Counsel on September 9, 2026.
Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as published in the U.S. Code: the thirty-day clause for new or additional duties after a proclamation.
The cited passage, with surrounding source text
… <p class="statutory-body">Whenever the President shall find as a fact that any foreign country places any burden or disadvantage upon the commerce of the United States by any of the unequal impositions or discriminations aforesaid, he shall, when he finds that the public interest will be served thereby, by proclamation specify and declare such new or additional rate or rates of duty as he shall determine will offset such burden or disadvantage, not to exceed 50 per centum ad valorem or its equivalent, on any products of, or on articles imported in a vessel of, such foreign country; and thirty days after the date of such proclamation there shall be levied, collected, and paid upon the articles enumerated in such proclamation when imported into the United States from such foreign country such new or additional rate or rates of duty; or, in case of articles declared subject to exclusion from importation into the United States under the provisions of subdivision (b) of this section, such articles shall be excluded from importation.</p> <a name="substructure-location_e"></a> <h4 class="subsection-head">(e) Duties to offset benefits to third country</h4> …
Read the original · Open the copy we saved
Where we use it
- Canada's counter-tariffs on C$27.6 billion (about US$20 billion) of U.S. goods took effect September 8 · cited for Section 338's thirty-day clause for new or additional duties
About this saved copy
The fingerprint identifies the saved text used for this record. A different copy has a different fingerprint.
- Text fingerprint (SHA-256)
861bb584f2cdabb377c734f016104c78efafd49c6d3cee8b4a273f551afca66a
Timeline entries this record anchors: Supreme Court holds IEEPA does not authorize the challenged tariffs.